The plaintiff's appeal and the conjunctive claim added by this court are all dismissed.

After the appeal, the costs are assessed against the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. Before the subdivision, the name of the administrative district was changed to the 3rd 5th 5th Maddong-gu Daejeon Seo-gu, Daejeon, Daejeon, and the size was 3471 square meters for registration conversion.

In 1955, the land cadastre of Q as the owner was restored to the land before subdivision (hereinafter referred to as “land before subdivision”).

B. On June 2, 1970, theO completed the registration of initial ownership relating to the land before subdivision.

C. On September 19, 1981, Defendant B, an inheritor of theO, completed the registration of ownership transfer on the land before subdivision due to property inheritance on July 26, 1981.

Defendant B completed the registration of ownership transfer on the ground of sale as of February 26, 1993 with respect to the portion of 1989/3471 out of the land before subdivision on March 3, 1993 to U.

E. On December 22, 1995, as a partition of co-owned property, Defendant B owned the remaining 3273 square meters of Nsung-gu Daejeon District, Daejeon District after being divided into V with a 198 square meters in the land prior to the partition of co-owned property.

F. On March 19, 2004, the amount of 500 square meters of the same Gu Wro (EM registration conversion on March 19, 2004) and 45 square meters of the Daejeon Seodong-gu Ndong-gu N273 square meters was divided into Y, respectively.

G. On July 17, 2018, Defendant B sold 2728m2 (hereinafter “instant forest”) to the remaining Defendants except Defendant B, and completed the registration of ownership transfer on the same day.

H. In the instant forest land, there are seedlingss of Q, their spouses, and the three South Z of net Q (new construction in 1961) and their spouses, and the Defendant AA (Death in 1982) in the forest land of this case.

I. Defendant B is a person of O who registered the preservation of ownership of the land before division as the descendants of the net Q AB.

O is adopted by the South AC of the deceased net Q, who died without his own loss.

On the other hand, U purchased some of the shares in the land before the subdivision in 1993 from Defendant B is the grandchildren of the net Z located in the forest of this case.

[Grounds for recognition] Gap 1, 2, 13, 14, 15, Eul 8 and 9, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff's assertion

A. The Plaintiff is established at the time of the death of Q Q, AEC 25 years old, and Q, at the same time.