logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.05.27 2013가합17400
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The Defendants asserted that they operated a factory in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and the Plaintiff worked in the above factory from 1987 to 1993. The Defendants paid only KRW 7 million out of the total amount of the Plaintiff’s wages of KRW 21,168,000 calculated by the minimum wage during the above service period and did not pay the remainder of the wages. In addition, they committed tort such as assault, abuse, and sexual assault against the Plaintiff.

Therefore, the Defendants are obliged to pay the Plaintiff the total amount of KRW 300 million and damages for delay for unpaid wages and illegal acts.

2. In full view of the following facts: (a) there is no evidence to acknowledge the Plaintiff’s assertion; (b) the Plaintiff filed a criminal complaint against the Defendant C on several occasions under the charge of indecent act by compulsion; (c) the prosecutor of the Goyang branch’s office rendered a decision of rejection on March 17, 2014 and September 29, 2014; (d) the Plaintiff filed a criminal complaint against the Defendant C on November 10, 2014; (c) the Prosecutor of the Busan District Public Prosecutor’s Office dismissed the Defendant’s complaint on the charge of assault; and (d) the Plaintiff filed a criminal complaint against the Defendant C on December 22, 2014 with the suspicion of assault; (d) the Prosecutor of the Busan Public Prosecutor’s Office’s Office’s order of rejection on December 22, 2014; and (e) the Plaintiff filed a criminal complaint against the Defendant C’s attempted criminal charge by assaulting the Defendant C’s information and communications network; and (e) the Plaintiff filed a criminal complaint against the Defendant C’s prosecutor’s order.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow