1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, which cited the judgment, is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for dismissal or addition of the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, it is accepted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of

【The parts to be removed or added】 5 pages 5, 6 pages 4, 1, and 6 of the table, and 1 of the last sentence, the “this Court” shall each be considered as the “the first instance court”.

6면 표 아래 3행에 “이 법원의 신체감정의도 이 사건 상이에 관하여 ‘무릎뼈 돌출을 제거한 골극제거술의 수술 후 창상부위에 잔존하는 통증의 결과로 판단된다’는 소견을 제시하였는바, 이는 결국 이 사건 상이의 발생 원인을 이 사건 질환에 대한 수술 이후에 잔존하는 통증으로 보는 것으로 위 제1심 신체감정의의 의학적 소견과 다르지 않다.”를 추가한다.

In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is justifiable, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.