1. The Defendant’s KRW 120,000,000 as well as 5% per annum from March 5, 2016 to May 16, 2016 to the Plaintiff.

According to the statements in Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3, the plaintiff claimed that the defendant was repaid KRW 170,000,000 on August 11, 2014, and KRW 60,000,000 on August 12, 2014, and KRW 20,000 on August 13, 2014, and KRW 10,000 on August 13, 2014, and KRW 5,00,000 on August 25, 2014, and KRW 170,000,000 on August 25, 2014, and KRW 170,00,000 on October 15, 2014 (the plaintiff each of the above loans was repaid from each of the above loans to the defendant, but there is no evidence to support the fact that the repayment was made by the plaintiff.

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff 120,00,000 won in total with the remaining loans and the amount of damages for delay at each rate of 5% per annum under the Civil Act and 15% per annum under the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion of Legal Proceedings, etc. from March 4, 2016 to May 16, 2016, where it is deemed reasonable for the defendant to dispute as to the existence or scope of the obligation of performance of this case from March 4, 2016 to the day following the delivery date of a copy of the complaint of this case containing the purport of demanding the payment of the above obligation to the defendant. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case is accepted within the extent of the above recognition, and the remaining claims are dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.