The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The defendant and the injured party B are married married couple.

A. On November 15, 2017, around 12:00, the Defendant reported that the Defendant drinks the victim B (38 years of age) from the Defendant’s home at C501, and said that the Defendant drinks only, at that time, he/she was at the time at the time her seat at the time.

B. At around 20:00 on the same day, the Defendant told the victim of the settlement at the above place. “I am Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma.

For the reason that “the head was said to be “,” assaulted by leading the head to the room, leading the head to the bed, tightly, sexual harassment, etc.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act.

In this regard, according to the statement of withdrawal of complaint filed on January 19, 2018, which was bound in the trial records, the victim may recognize the fact that he/she has withdrawn his/her wish to punish the defendant after the institution of the instant indictment.

Therefore, this part of the prosecution is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.