All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

The sentencing of the court below (6 months of imprisonment and 2 years of suspended execution) is too unreasonable because of the summary of the reasons for appeal.

The prosecutor (misunderstanding of facts) G takes a public performance as a member of the public performance belonging to X from September 201 to November 201, 201 and receives monthly pay; G’s work book was prepared voluntarily by the Defendant; the Defendant’s work book was worked at the company operated by the Defendant.

In light of the fact that S, R, U, etc. are unable to memory G, and the account in the name of E was managed by the Defendant, and the benefits deposited in each account in the name of G were all withdrawn from the same bank at intervals of one to two minutes, and the balance of KRW 1,160 of the account in the name of G was transferred to the account in the name of the Defendant, etc., the Defendant may recognize the fact that he reported the fact that he did not have worked in the company operated by G to a person who was employed by the Defendant, and received the Seoul

Judgment

The summary of the facts charged regarding the prosecutor’s assertion of mistake in fact was that the Defendant operated D Co., Ltd. in Songpa-gu Seoul from February 201 to December 201, 201.

When the Defendant is designated as a social enterprise from Seoul Special Metropolitan City, he/she was aware of the fact that he/she could receive labor costs for part-time workers for a maximum of two years and the amount equivalent to the amount of the social insurance premium to be borne by the business owner, and submitted an application for designation of a Seoul-type social enterprise in the name of the above company to the Seoul-gu Seoul-gu Seoul-type social enterprise, and entered into an agreement with the Songpa-gu Seoul-gu Seoul-type social enterprise support organization with the damaged company. After which the above company was selected as a Seoul-type social enterprise, he/she did not have worked in the company

The Defendant, around August 31, 201, at the office of the Song-gu Office located in Songpa-gu Seoul Olympic Games, as the Seoul Olympic Games, for the labor cost of August 201, 201, that G was employed as an employee of the said company from August 1, 201 to August 31, 2011.