1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the Plaintiff corresponding to the following additional payment order shall be revoked.

Facts of recognition

The defendant is a person who operates a sexually in the name of "C".

On November 2, 2012, the Plaintiff received from the Defendant a stem cell type operation.

(hereinafter “instant surgery.” After the instant surgery, the Plaintiff suffered a large number of pains of 1.5 cm in size and 1.5 cm on both banks, following the instant surgery.

The local stem cell type type is the procedure law that separates sex stem cells (it can be divided into local tax prisoners of war) from local organizations extracted from clothes, buckbucks, etc., and injects the stem cells into chest together with the local area, so that a new local organization is formed in the breast bank and a blood donor becomes a bucker.

In 2007, some good results were reported, but the case number was written and the case number was written, and there was a side effect that the US Tropic disease left or reciting the US Tropic disease, or that the US Tropic body becomes worse than the existing one, and G doctor who has developed the above operation was required to conduct a clinical trial because the long-term effect of the above operation has not yet been fully proven.

The Daese diversity, which occurred to the plaintiff, is the collapse of the local area and the diversity due to the side effects caused by the local tissue transplantation.

The pain caused by the collapse is anticipated to be unexploited after the lapse of a day, and the collapse is not caused by permanent or due to its declosion or a phenomenon harmful to the human body, and removal of the collapse is unnecessary.

[Ground of recognition] In the absence of dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 3 and 4, and the result of the physical appraisal entrustment and fact inquiry to the E Hospital Head of the court of first instance and the court of first instance, the plaintiff asserted the purport of the whole pleadings. The plaintiff asserted the purport of the argument is that the defendant has a unique technical ability for local stem cell type alcohol, extract and transplant stem cells by inhaleing unnecessary areas, and then extract and transplant stem cells than general local transplantation.