logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.01.31 2019가단5059130
대여금
Text

1. The Defendants jointly and severally against the Intervenor succeeding the Plaintiff.

A. As to KRW 12,406,608 and its 11,380,388 among them, November 2018

Reasons

1. Indication of claim;

(a) Plaintiff’s claim: The grounds for the claim are as specified in attached Form;

(B) The plaintiff submitted a written withdrawal from the lawsuit to this court. However, since the plaintiff did not obtain the defendant's explicit consent to withdrawal from the lawsuit, the withdrawal is not recognized. The plaintiff transferred his claim to the plaintiff succeeding intervenor to the plaintiff to the plaintiff, and the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is without merit.

The plaintiff succeeding intervenor's claim: The grounds for the claim are as specified in attached Form.

(However, the “creditor” and “debtor” are deemed to be the “Defendant” and “Defendant”). 2. Claim against Defendant 1: by public notice (Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act)

3. Claim against Defendant 2: Judgment on deemed confession (Article 208 (3) 2 of the Civil Procedure Act).

arrow