1. The Defendant: KRW 30,067,690 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from January 29, 2016 to May 18, 2018.

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff is a special corporation established by the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act (hereinafter referred to as the "Industrial Accident Insurance Act") and entrusted with the industrial accident compensation insurance business by the Minister of Employment and Labor, and is in the relationship between the insurer and the policyholder under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act (hereinafter referred to as the "non-party company"), and the defendant is an insurer who has entered into an automobile insurance contract with respect to the non-party company C vehicles owned by the non-party company

B. At around 15:50 on November 26, 2013, D, an employee of the non-party company of the traffic accident, caused an accident to conceal the vehicle driven in the same direction while driving a vehicle near the Daegu-gu Port Highway (hereinafter referred to as the “accident in this case”), and Non-party E (hereinafter referred to as the “victim”) who was on board the top of the accident vehicle at the time was on board, suffered a large number of injuries, such as the upper right-hand alley, the upper left-hand pelle pelle, the left-hand pelle pelle, the left-hand pelle pelle, the left-hand pelle pelle, the left-hand pelle pelle, and the left-hand pelle.

C. The recipient of the industrial accident insurance benefits was determined as class 00 of the industrial accident grade 08 due to the injury suffered by the instant accident, and the Plaintiff paid 14,219,140 won of the total amount of medical care benefits (medical care benefits) for the victim, temporary disability compensation benefits, 46,218,510 won, and disability lump sum amounting to 47,03,180 won, under the Industrial Accident Insurance Act.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute and entry of Gap evidence 1 through 6 (including provisional numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply)

2. Chief;

A. The Defendant, the insurer of the vehicle that caused the occurrence of the right to indemnity, is liable to compensate for the damages suffered by the victim in relation to the instant accident caused by the mistake that caused the occurrence of the accident by the said D’s failure to keep the safety distance without driving the vehicle on the front of the accident. The Plaintiff is acting in subrogation of the damage claim against the Defendant within the scope of the industrial accident insurance benefits paid pursuant to Article 87(1) of the Industrial Accident Insurance Act.

(b) the victim;