logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.04.19 2017가단5132109
구상금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 24,219,288 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of 5% from May 20, 2017 to April 19, 2018.

Reasons

1.The following facts do not conflict between the Parties:

On May 20, 2015, B: (a) around 03:50 on May 20, 2015, the occurrence of a traffic accident, etc.: (b) the Defendant was carrying the Defendant, driving the CBA car, and driving the CBA car, and the driver of DBA car (hereinafter referred to as “the instant vehicle”) who discovered it, stopped the instant vehicle in front of the Defendant, in order to reduce the responsibility for the driver’s knife at the rear side of the driver’s seat to the central separation zone. (b) The Defendant was driving the said vehicle to the front side of the road and parked the vehicle in the vicinity of the central separation zone. (c) The driver of DBA car (hereinafter referred to as “the instant vehicle”) who discovered it.

3) However, F is a G-business taxi (hereinafter “instant taxi”).

) When driving a vehicle, driving a vehicle, and driving the vehicle, which was stopped on the front side of the vehicle while driving the vehicle at the first two-lanes of the said vehicle, was found to be late, and the vehicle was rapidly changed to the second two-lanes, the front part of the vehicle driven on the left side of the H-wing vehicle, which driven on the second two-lanes, was shocked into the lower part of the cab, and the said towing vehicle was pushed down to the left side, and the lower part of the vehicle stopped on the front part of the said towing vehicle. Accordingly, the vehicle was pushed up by the Defendant who was driven on the front side of the said towing vehicle while being pushed up in the future, and there was a conflict between the front part of the IMF W and the upper part of the said towing vehicle, which was loaded on the front side of the said towing vehicle. Accordingly, the Defendant suffered an injury to the right side of the said vehicle, e.g., e., e., e., e., e., the vehicle.

4) The Plaintiff, the owner of the instant taxi, is not more than the Commercial Transport Co., Ltd.

arrow