logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원안동지원 2017.07.19 2015가단3204
채무부존재확인
Text

1. The Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) paid KRW 21,557,967 to the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) and its related amount from May 21, 2015 to July 19, 2017.

Reasons

1. The following facts of recognition are not disputed between the parties or may be acknowledged in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, and Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 6 (including each number, if any; hereinafter the same shall apply):

The plaintiff is the owner of B-si for business use (hereinafter referred to as "Plaintiff-si").

B. At around 03:50 on May 20, 2015, the Defendant (C) was driving a motor vehicle driven by D, and the figure behind the driver’s seat falls from the center separation zone, and D stopped the said motor vehicle on the side of the road, and the Defendant fell from the said road to the center separation zone, and was in the vicinity of the center separation zone.

The driver of Franchisa car (hereinafter referred to as “the instant car”) discovered this, was a state of stopping a vehicle in front of the Defendant.

B. On May 20, 2015, G: (a) around 03:52, when driving the Plaintiff taxi, and stopping the first lane of the four-lanes in the front direction of the instant passenger vehicle in front of the instant passenger vehicle, which was stopped in the front direction of the armal length in the front direction of the instant passenger vehicle; (b) changed the two-lanes to the two-lanes; (c) the left-hand part of the Hsch Rexroth (hereinafter “instant passenger”); (d) the instant passenger vehicle driven in the front right-hand part of the instant passenger vehicle, which was driven in the front right-hand part of the instant passenger vehicle; and (e) the impact of the instant passenger vehicle, which was driven in the front right-hand part of the instant passenger vehicle, was shocked by the rear part of the instant passenger vehicle, which was parked in the first direction of the instant passenger vehicle, and led to the shock to the front end of the instant passenger vehicle in front of the instant passenger vehicle in front of the instant passenger vehicle.

Accordingly, the defendant suffered injury to the right side, 2, 3, 4, 2, 3, 1, 1, 1, 1, 3, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 3

(hereinafter “instant accident”) 2. Determination

A. 1) The above recognition is based on the occurrence of liability.

arrow