Defendant

A Imprisonment for 10 months, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 5,000,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Punishment of the crime

No one shall engage in the business of exchanging or arranging exchange or repurchase tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game products.

The Defendants: (a) Defendant A, while operating a F entertainment room on the seventh floor of the E building at the time of residence, acted as a broker for customers to manage the overall game room and periodically communicate with his name-free money exchange so that customers may change the premiums obtained in cash; and (b) Defendant B, while serving as an employee of the said entertainment room, offered customers to arrange for the exchange of premiums obtained through the game by way of each customer’s management role of free gifts in the said entertainment room; and (c) from August 22, 2012 to August 24, 2012: Provided, That in accordance with evidence, Defendant B appears to have worked from August 24, 2012.

Until September 13, 2012, at the above entertainment room, 50 games for 'Neuk Sea' game machine was established to allow many unspecified customers to play the game, and the gift which is the result of the use of the game was exchanged to 4,500 won per gift on the name-free exchange in the above way by allowing customers to exchange the gift acquired through the use of the game with 4,500 won per gift in the above manner.

Summary of Evidence

1. The legal statement of Defendant A and some of Defendant B’s legal statement

1. Each prosecutor's interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. The prosecutor's statement concerning G;

1. The police statement of H;

1. Records and lists of police seizure;

1. A copy of each 112 report on non-control of public morals business place; and

1. Data on the integration of telephone details;

1. In full view of the details and period of the activities performed by Defendant B at a entertainment room, the type of work, and the fact that at the time of crackdown, the above Defendant was in possession of a mobile phone device used to communicate with the money exchange market, the currency details with the relevant parties, customers H, G, etc., the above Defendant was at least dolusisisony with respect to the activities of arranging money exchange.