1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiffs falling under the following order of payment shall be revoked.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The relevant Defendant is a doctor who started the opening of an O hospital in the same building that Non-Party N, after the closure of the J Hospital on July 29, 2016 at Pyeongtaek-si, Defendant I operated the J Hospital, and Plaintiff A is the spouse of the network K (LL; hereinafter “the deceased”) who was treated at the above hospital, and the rest of the Plaintiffs are the deceased’s children, and M is the Defendant’s employee who was treated by the doctor.

B. On May 7, 2013, the Deceased’s members of the J Hospital and the details of diagnosis and treatment 1) The Deceased complained of symptoms, such as the pain of drafting (the pain around the mold) around 08:22 on May 7, 2013, and was within the emergency room of the J Hospital (hereinafter “the first internal hospital”).

2) However, the deceased returned to the J Hospital at around 09:51 on the same day (hereinafter referred to as “the second visit”) with the Plaintiff C, who did not take any particular measure after having taken a medical care, and the deceased returned to 10 minutes of the medical team. 2) At around 09:51 on the same day, the deceased filed an appeal for the 'bregratium (the main lake and marsh card)’ and the 'bregratum decline for telegraph, the deceased’s appeal for the 'bregatium’.

(No. 2, No. 1), No. 3, 2, the deceased at the time of the second internal investigation, with respect to the time of the X-ray inspection and the depth inspection under the prescription of doctor M, the following:

2. At around 10:30, after undergoing a detailed examination in the paragraph (c), hospitalized in the five-story ward.

In the nursing record book, it is recorded that "it is in an emergency room where meals have been disturbed from today's invasion and have been hospitalized due to lack of symptoms."

4) Afterwards, the deceased her blood blood blood blood blood blood blood, showed her respiratory distress, around 14:05, and around 14:05, the deceased showed the symptoms of cardiopulmonary macy, and the doctor Monor observe the heart monor as a cardiopulmonary monitor (EKG monor) and conducted cardiopulmonary pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) but did not have any effect. Afterwards, the deceased was immediately killed. (In fact that there was no dispute over the grounds for recognition, the descriptions and images of evidence Nos. 1 through 8, and the result of this court’s personal examination of the Plaintiff C.