beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On December 15, 2017, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol of 0.066% in blood without obtaining a driver’s license for a vehicle at around 21:40 on December 15, 2017, the Defendant driving a vehicle with B low string in the section of approximately 900 meters in the direction of the 100-7th to the road near the 8-7th junci city of Gangseo-si to the 60th junci city of Gangseo-si.
2. The Defendant was found to have driven alcohol as stated in the above 1. Aviation Expenses of the Gangnam Police Station and demanded to present personal information from police officers affiliated with C, as he/she discovered that he/she had driven alcohol as stated in the above 1.
Accordingly, the defendant, who is not the principal, was informed of the name and resident registration number of the defendant type E, and D, was notified that "the principal confirms that the above mentioned matters are true, the license is (cancellation and suspension) due to the primary driving," and the result of the measurement is recognized and blood is not want to be collected.
After stating the “no objection” in the driver’s statement column printed as “E” and signing the “E” as “E,” and forging the driver’s statement column in the driver’s circumstantial statement report at the State driver’s expense of the above E, which is a private document concerning the factual verification, and continuously delivering the same as if the above private document was duly formed to D who is aware of the fact.
Accordingly, the Defendant, for the purpose of uttering, forged the driver's statement column in the driver's opinion statement report to E, which is a private document to prove facts.
3. The Defendant, at the time, at the place specified in the foregoing paragraph 1. The Defendant, such as the electronic records of the company, and the electronic records of the above writers, notified the Defendant as described in the foregoing paragraph 2. The Defendant, using a portable information device (PDA) for the guard of the Gangnam Police Station, and for the patrolman affiliated with C, using the portable information device (PDA).