1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Basic Facts

On February 10, 2017, the Plaintiff drinking alcohol with the Defendant at “D” located in Gunsan-si, and assaulted the Defendant’s head part to drink once and inflicted bodily injury, such as spambling, which requires one week’s treatment. Accordingly, the Defendant, who was on the table, spamed on the table by spambling the Plaintiff’s left part of the body of 8 weeks of treatment (hereinafter “the instant assault”), caused the Plaintiff to spam the Plaintiff by shocking the Plaintiff’s spambling of the body of spambling that requires eight weeks of treatment (hereinafter “instant injury”).

As for the crime of injury, the Defendant was prosecuted for the crime of injury by negligence, and was sentenced to a fine of KRW 1 million from the Gunsan Branch of the Jeonju District Court on November 22, 2017 to a fine of KRW 201,00,000, and KRW 3 million from the Defendant.

[Ground of recognition] The defendant shall compensate for damages suffered by the plaintiff due to the assault of this case, according to the above facts finding that there is no dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 3 and 13 (including virtual numbers, hereinafter the same shall apply), and the purport of the whole pleadings.

The damages suffered by the Plaintiff due to the instant accident within the scope of liability for damages are as follows:

The calculation of the period for the convenience of calculation shall be calculated on a monthly basis, and the amount of less than a month shall be discarded, and in calculating the amount, the amount of less than a won shall be discarded, and the current price at the time of the accident shall be calculated by the

It is rejected that the parties' arguments did not separately state their opinions.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there is no dispute, entry of Gap evidence 3 through 6, the result of a physical appraisal commission to the head of the first instance court's I Hospital, the purport of the whole pleadings

A. In case of lost income: Personal information 1) 78,360,210 won: Girst male, 57 years old and 2 months old and age 12 at the time of the accident: The plaintiff alleged that the unit price of wages in the adjoining area should be applied. However, the evidence alone submitted by the plaintiff is insufficient to recognize that the plaintiff was working for the adjoining area with qualification as a substitute technician, and the evidence No. 5 is proved.