1. Of the judgment of the first instance, the part against the Plaintiff is modified as follows.

The defendant is charged with KRW 77,691,106 to the plaintiff.

1. The reasoning of this Court is that the relevant part of the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to that of the relevant part of the judgment of the court of first instance, and such part is cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of

2. In calculating the scope of liability for damages, a period of time shall be calculated on a monthly basis, and less than a month shall be included in the side on which the appraised value is less than a month, and an amount less than the last month and less than a won shall be discarded, respectively

The calculation of the present price shall be calculated at the present price at the time of the accident of this case in accordance with the simple discount method that deducts intermediary interest at the rate of 5/12 per month, and the number of heading shall be calculated only up to the fourth decimal place.

It is rejected that the parties' arguments have not been separately explained.

[Ground of recognition] In the absence of dispute, Gap evidence 2, 4, 7, 10 (including each number in the case of additional number), Gap evidence 6-1 through 5, Eul evidence 3, 9, the result of the first instance court's physical examination of the head of Chungcheongnamnam University Hospital, the result of the fact inquiry of part of the first instance court's first instance court's first instance court's first instance court's first examination of the above head of Chungcheongnamnam University Hospital, the result of this court's physical examination of the chief of J Hospital, the whole purport of the arguments, and the whole purport of the arguments.

A. The date of birth of basic matters, such as the Plaintiff’s personal information: The date of birth of the instant accident by male: The age at the time of the accident on December 9, 2013: The age at the time of the accident: The age at the age of 66 years and 8 months: April 5, 2024: Other matters are stated in the column of “basic matters” in the attached Form of the damages calculation sheet.

(1) At the time of the instant accident, the Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff’s age was 67 years and 16.44 years and that the life expectancy was 16.44 years and did not make a separate reference as to the life curtailment.

In full view of the records of No. 10, No. 10, and No. 9, and the results of the first instance court’s physical examination of part of the fact-finding, as well as the purport of the entire pleadings as a result of the court’s physical examination of the J Hospital Head, 10, and No. 9, and the first instance court’s fact-finding.