Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 7, 2013, the Defendant started the removal of the building before the Defendant removed the building at the site of the demolition project located in Yong-gun, Young-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, the Defendant laid off one ton of the freight vehicles G on the access road to the site of the construction site and obstructed the entry of large trucks into the site of the construction site by parking one ton of freight vehicles on the access road to the site of the construction site, and obstructed the Defendant from standing up on the right side of the construction site that works with H, I, and J with heavy equipment to drink and drinking alcohol, and without giving money, frightened as it interferes with the construction.

On December 10, 2012, the Defendant received delivery of KRW 5.5 million around 10:52 on December 10, 2012 from a food victim.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by threatening the victim.

2. From November 1, 2012 to April 14, 2012 of the same month, the Defendant began to remove the building before the Defendant removed the building, and obstructed the entry of dump trucks into the construction site by parking one ton of freight vehicles at the access road to the construction site, and around January 12, 2013, at the site of the removal construction site, the Defendant interfered with the removal of waste concrete, namely, “the dump concrete would be stolen if it would bring about a dump truck” and “the dump concrete would be stolen if it would bring about a dump truck.” On the 14th of the same month, the Defendant interfered with the removal of waste concrete by a method of carrying it out at the place where the equipment would be loaded into a dump truck, and, without giving money, continued to interfere with construction.

The Defendant received delivery of KRW 15 million on the same day from the victim of drinking, around 17:58 on the same day.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by threatening the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. A statutory statement to the effect that the Defendant “to receive money by interfering with business as stated in paragraph (1) of the facts charged, and to recognize paragraph (2) of the facts charged,” made by this Court.

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Each police statement of F, L, or M;

1.F.