logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2020.06.04 2019나65559
손해배상(기)
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance as to this case is as follows, except for the dismissal or addition of part of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is acceptable to cite it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(1) The court of first instance held that the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the court of first instance, which the plaintiffs submitted at the court of first instance, included the evidence No. 44 through 47, and U.S. witness testimony at the court of first instance, is justifiable in its finding of facts and determination at the court of first instance, and there is no error as alleged by the plaintiffs as the grounds for appeal). The third-party 15 to fourth-party 1 of the judgment of first instance is dismissed as follows.

(1) Defendant J planned to proceed with the cosmetic business only to sell cosmetics to the members who have produced functional cosmetics and paid monthly membership fees. The main contents of the cosmetic business are to make 50% payment of membership fees collected by the pertinent business owner to those who have purchased the above cosmetic business (hereinafter “instant business rights”) and to those who have purchased the above cosmetic business rights, and to encourage the said business owner to purchase the above business rights or to introduce them to those who have purchased the above cosmetic business rights when introducing a new business right purchaser.

(2) Accordingly, the Plaintiff A decided to purchase the instant business rights, and theO recommended the rest of the Plaintiffs except the Plaintiff A to purchase the instant business rights, and the remaining Plaintiffs also decided to purchase the instant business rights.

On the other hand, Defendant J purchased the instant business rights in the following manner, on the grounds that there was a method of either directly paying cash to Defendant K or subscribing to the insurance products he solicits, by means of the purchase of the instant business rights:

The 5th day of the first instance judgment "member's meeting" shall be raised to "member's membership fee".

The judgment of the court of first instance is written.

arrow