logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2015.11.11 2015가합21254
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The business right listed in the attached list (hereinafter “instant business right”) originally was a business operated by Hoho Housing Co., Ltd., and Adoro Housing Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “ Adoro Housing”) transferred the instant business right to the Defendant, on July 27, 1996, to which the Defendant guaranteed the loan obligations of financial institutions for Adoro Housing, on May 26, 1997, during the implementation of the instant business after obtaining approval for the change of the business plan from the head of Jinjin-gun, the competent administrative agency, to himself/herself after obtaining the approval for change of the business plan.

B. On July 197, 197, despite the transfer of the instant business rights, the ASEAN Housing did not perform the procedure for change of name, and the ASEAN Housing did not perform the procedure for the change of name. On May 27, 1997, the ASEAN Housing Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “Domin Housing”) which jointly and severally guaranteed the indemnity obligations under the credit guarantee letter submitted by the Defendant and the ASEAN Housing to obtain a loan of rental housing construction funds (hereinafter referred to as “Domin Housing”) and the gold Industry Development Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “gold Industrial Development,” and the Defendant, the Domin Housing, the Domin Housing, and the Domin Housing Development, together with the development of the gold Business, agreed on March 18, 1998 (hereinafter referred to as the “instant agreement”). On the same day, the 3rd anniversary of May 27, 1997, the ASEAN Housing, which the Defendant filed against the Defendant against the name of the instant business rights, appears to have been incorporated the Cheong Housing Court’s name as the 3.

§ 1. Construction in ASEAN.

The business rights and all rights in the instant case discontinued due to the company’s default shall be succeeded to by the third company guarantee, the development of the gold industry and the defendant, and the representative shall be the defendant and the defendant shall be the defendant for convenience, and the ASEAN shall be referred to as “A” and “B” for convenience.

The execution shall be executed by the defendant.

Article 2 Payment of Additional Construction Costs: Project in this case.

arrow