Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2014. 10. 15. 23:40경 구리시 B 앞 노상에서, 피고인이 술에 취하여 택시 안에서 일어나지 않는다는 112신고를 받고 현장에 출동한 구리경찰서 C지구대 소속 경장 D이 피고인에게 귀가할 것을 권유하자, 위 D에게 “뭘 꼬라봐 개새끼야, 씨발새끼야 똑바로 하라고, 씨발새끼야 한 번 맞을래 공권력 씨발새끼야”라고 욕설을 하며 D이 착용하고 있던 경찰 모자의 창을 잡고 D의 머리를 위, 아래로 흔들다가 모자를 벗겨 창을 잡은 상태로 그 모자를 이용하여 D의 얼굴을 3회 때려 폭행하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers in relation to 112 reported duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of E;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The Defendant’s act of sentencing on the grounds of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is not good enough. As such, there is sufficient need to strictly punish the Defendant on the ground that it is necessary to give a warning to the light view of public power that has recently been fluent in society.

However, a fine has been selected for the following reasons: (a) the Defendant committed the instant crime by contingently, (b) the Defendant led to the instant crime; (c) the Defendant has been led to the confession and reflect of the instant crime; (d) the Defendant has no criminal record of the same kind of crime; and (e) the Defendant appears to have served as a sincere member of society; and (e) other various circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct; (e) the background and motive leading to the instant crime; and (e) the circumstances before and after the instant crime, etc.