Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, as to the Defendants, it shall be for 2 years from the date of each judgment.

Punishment of the crime

At around 00:50 on April 13, 2014, the Defendants conspired and notified the Defendants that the Defendants would be arrested in fraud if the police officer belonging to the Fabs box, such as G, who was dispatched to the said place, recommended the Defendants to pay the drinking value and did not pay the drinking value without good cause, and Defendant A expressed that: (a) the above police officer would be arrested in fraud; (b) the chest part of the above G was h’s chest h’s chest with the Defendant’s chest h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to interfere with the legitimate performance of duties concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of police officers' crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to police statements made to H, G, and I;

1. Relevant Articles and 136(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act - The Defendants’ choice of punishment

1. Concurrent Crimes - Defendants: former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Act

1. Suspension of execution - Defendants: Reasons for the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act [Scope of Recommendation] No person who has no basic area (6 to 1 year and 4 months) (limited to a person who has been specially punished) [decision of sentence] Defendants’ act cannot avoid the choice of imprisonment with prison labor in that it does not constitute violence against police officers who perform legitimate official duties, and it is not good that the Defendants’ act constitutes violence against police officers who perform legitimate official duties, and that it is necessary to sound a light of a light of public power which is incidental to society.

However, there are no criminal records against the Defendants.