The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court and the first instance court, the lower court’s determination that the modified facts charged were guilty is justifiable, and there was no error by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on

In addition, in the crime of breach of trust of this case, the argument that the victim is not C, but the association is a legitimate ground for appeal, or that the court below did not consider it as a subject of a judgment ex officio, does not constitute a legitimate ground for appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.