beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
"2017 Highest 560"
1. On April 2015, the Defendant was scheduled to purchase the 6th to 10th rooftop of the 10th to 6th to 10th of the 10th of the 10th anniversary of the Defendant’s son’s friendship victim E with D’s friendship.
The sales of KRW 8-1 billion have occurred annually at that place, and even if the expenses have been excluded, the net profit of KRW 700 million can be raised annually.
If the credit rating is fine, it shall be lent to a credit loan of KRW 50 million. It is intended to lend money to a public notice board for work.
The loan will be paid with all principal and interest after using the funds for the purchase of the telecom.
“.......”
However, the Defendant’s monthly income is equivalent to approximately KRW 9 million per month, and the interest borne by the financial institution at the time when the Defendant’s monthly income is equal to KRW 6 million. The Defendant did not have any economic ability to accept the SH’s building due to the lack of any property other than H public notice, and even if he borrowed money from the damaged party, the Defendant was planning to use the money first to repay the Defendant’s personal debt, so the Defendant did not have any intent and ability to repay the money within the agreed period even if he borrowed money from the damaged party.
Nevertheless, the Defendant, as seen above, made a false statement to the victim and received delivery of KRW 30 million from the injured party on April 17, 2015.
The Defendant, not later than July 24, 2015, by deceiving the victim as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Form, and was given a total of KRW 420 million from the victim four times.
"2017 Highest 1565"
2. On July 14, 2015, the Defendant would repay the remainder of the real estate purchase and sale to the Victim K at the JJ office in Gwangju Mine-gu, Gwangju, in the end of July 14, 2015, with a loan of KRW 50 million to the victim K.
“False speech was made to the effect that it was “.”
Even if the Defendant borrowed money from the injured party, the Defendant did not have any intention or ability to repay the money on the agreed date.
Nevertheless, it is not appropriate.