A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

To order the defendant to complete a sexual assault treatment program for 40 hours.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On November 21, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a three-year suspended sentence of imprisonment with prison labor for causing injury or injury to the performance of special official duties in the support of the Suwon Fagwon, and the judgment became final and conclusive on April 18, 2015.

[2] Notwithstanding the fact that the Defendant had been married on December 29, 2006 and had been in the process of teaching with other women, the Defendant was willing to obtain money by deceiving with the victim E (the birth of May 1982) from May 2012 by hiding these facts.

1. Fraud;

A. On December 5, 2012, the Defendant must call the victim’s residence in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F and 1006, and return the investment funds received from G’s father to the victim.

Along with two weeks, a false statement was made to “a loan the subject money.”

However, fact was that G was a female at the time, and the amount received from the victim was thought to be used as living expenses of the above G, and even if it was borrowed money from the damaged party due to no particular property or source of revenue, G did not have the intention or ability to complete payment.

The Defendant, on the same day, received from the injured party the money of KRW 14 million from the new bank account (H) in the said G name on the same day. From July 30, 2012 to December 5, 2012, the Defendant deceivings the injured party on a total of five occasions, as stated in the list of crimes in the attached Table, and received a total of KRW 25.9 million from the injured party.

B. On September 12, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around March 12, 2012, at an infinite area in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, “I cannot make a credit card; and (b) the Defendant borrowed the card to the victim, who will pay the payment.

“A false representation was made.”

However, there was no intention or ability to pay the credit card even if the credit card was lent from the injured party due to no particular property or source of revenue.

The defendant's credit card in the name of the victim against the victim.