logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2019.10.04 2018가단10644
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On August 14, 2010, the Plaintiff suffered from a vehicle and a vehicle during the vehicle driving (hereinafter “the instant Obaba accident”) and received an open and solid diagnosis from B Hospital on the ground that it was subject to an open and solid diagnosis of the shape of the abandonment.

Since then, when the C Hospital received hospitalized treatment, it has occurred and received fratitis, fratation, cement inserting, etc. in the D Hospital.

B. In order to receive medical treatment at a higher hospital on February 7, 2011, the Plaintiff was transferred to the Gyeongbuk University Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant hospital”) operated by the Defendant on February 14, 201, subject to the diagnosis of aggregate infection, and received refrativity and washing, replacement of antibiotic cement block and strawing, and washing on March 9, 201, 30 and March 30, 201, replacement of antibiotic cement block, and replacement of antibiotic cement block using dyp and metal plates on April 12, 201, and replacement of dypical dypical dypical dyphere and dyphere and dyphere, and replacement of dypical dyphere and dypical dyphere on May 27, 2011.

C. On December 2, 2016, the Plaintiff was diagnosed by the Defendant Hospital as a pelvisor and an openrology. As of the date of the closing of argument in the instant case, slots were demoted as of the date of the closing of argument, and slots were reduced by 6.2 cm to the right, and approximately 8 degrees out and approximately 20 degrees back to the right, and appeal for pains.

[Reasons for Recognition] Uncontentious Facts, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 2, Eul evidence 2, the result of this court's commission of physical appraisal to E Hospital Head, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The Plaintiff asserted the cause of the Plaintiff’s claim is merely suffering from the fladder infection before the Plaintiff entered the Defendant hospital, and visited the Defendant hospital for the treatment of the fladine infection.

However, from February 14, 201 to January 4, 2012 at the Defendant Hospital, the Plaintiff received refluoring, etc. on chills, Escoping, Escoping, Escoping, Escoping, and metal functionals on several occasions, and the Defendant.

arrow