logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.01.25 2016나2034067
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The part against the defendant among the judgment of the court of first instance is revoked, and the plaintiff's claim corresponding to this part is dismissed.

2...

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court on this part of the facts based on the judgment of the court of first instance is in the third page of the judgment.

The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, and such reasoning is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. The main part of the judgment is as follows: “The plaintiff's current status 1) The plaintiff has a opening disorder of 21mm in the opening quantity at the time of the physical examination of the first instance court, there is a knife and pain in relation to both sprinks, and there is a knife and pain in relation to both sidess, and it was judged that there was a knife and a hiff in the front and front part of both sides.

On March 7, 2016, after the above physical examination, the Plaintiff was diagnosed on the parts of the luminous bones of both sides (in a state where the bones is not attached to its location), and Non-competing (in a state where the process of recovery was suspended and the bones is not attached) and performed an operation to reconstruct the bones of both sides through the bones transplantation, and was performed through a solid set. However, even after the above operation, the Plaintiff was conducted a physical examination similar to that of the first instance trial even after the physical examination conducted by this court, since the above operation was not significantly improved.

2) In order to treat an opening disorder, it is necessary to treat physical therapy, pharmacologic treatment, medication, as the case may be, and to conduct washing, etc., to the right luminous part, and to conduct correction through bones transplantation with respect to non-conformitys, and to the left-hand luminous part with respect to non-conformitys, it is necessary to remove brupty on the left-hand luminous part. 3) While it is possible to improve the brush brush and opening disorder to a certain extent through the above treatment, it is not possible to recover before the operation, and if the opening disorder continues to exist, brush disorder may remain.

[Ground of recognition] In the absence of dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 8 (including a branch number), the first instance court and the first instance court entrusted the physical examination of the National University of Tol, the second instance court with the examination of the body of the National University of Elives (the dental department, the dental department outside the mouth of Go River), and the first instance court entrusted the physical examination of the Korean National University of Slives (the sex department).

arrow