1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Summary of the plaintiff's assertion

A. On July 6, 2010, C and D purchased the automobiles listed in the separate sheet from the Defendant (hereinafter “instant automobiles”) around July 6, 2010.

(2) On November 23, 2015, the Plaintiff purchased the instant vehicle from C and D. At the time of the purchase, the Plaintiff acquired all claims against the Defendant and AD regarding the instant vehicle from C and D, and was delegated with the authority to notify the said assignment of claims.

(3) On March 7, 2016, while the Plaintiff purchased and operated the instant vehicle, there was an excessive consumption of the engine emitting days of the said vehicle. Around that time, the Plaintiff visited the Gwangju Service Center operated by the Defendant (hereinafter “instant Service Center”) and received general maintenance to exchange engine emitting days according to E’s guidance. On May 31, 2016, the instant Service Center was visited and inspected.

(4) On June 22, 2016, the Plaintiff visited the Service Center to receive an engine emission test for the instant motor vehicle in accordance with F’s instructions, and 1,000 KM 1,00 KM 3.26 liters.

(5) On June 27, 2016, the Plaintiff filed the instant lawsuit after obtaining a written estimate of the parts necessary for the repair of the instant vehicle according to the results of the said test from the Service Center, and was scheduled to proceed with the instant vehicle repair according to the outcome of the instant lawsuit.

(6) However, in light of the seriousness of the defect of the instant vehicle and the fact that it is impossible to drive a short distance, the instant service center requested to repair the instant vehicle according to the estimate of parts previously issued on October 4, 2016.

(7) However, employees of the instant service center shall file with the Plaintiff on October 5, 2016.