1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract with B with respect to CPod S-MAX automobiles (hereinafter “instant automobiles”) owned by it, and the Defendant is a person who operates the Daejeon Seo-gu Daejeon Motor Vehicle Maintenance Office (hereinafter “instant Maintenance Office”).

B. On March 6, 2014, B visited the instant maintenance facility on the ground that the instant motor vehicle was not well moving in the future, and inspected and repaired the instant motor vehicle, such as an engine error exchange and fuel projector, etc. At the time, water leakage phenomenon was discovered on the pipe connected to the fuel projector of the instant motor vehicle, and thus, the Defendant performed the work of linking the projector with the pipe.

At the time, the defendant ordered B to replace projector, fuel pipe, fuel straw, etc., when warning B that the instant motor vehicle might be excessively deteriorated and leakage problems may occur later, but B refused to exchange for the part without at least the head of the party.

C. B, even on March 7, 2014 and March 10, 2014, visited the instant maintenance facility on the ground of water leakage in engines, etc. At each time, the Defendant and the employees of the instant maintenance facility recommended the replacement of deteriorated parts, such as projector and fuel pipe, but B refused to pay money to the maximum extent possible.

B Around 12:35 on March 17, 2014, the instant motor vehicle was operated and passed a 109 Yando 109 Yando, the Yando, the Yando, the Yando, adjacent to the Chungcheongnam-gun Park, and the instant motor vehicle was destroyed by a fire in the part of the instant motor vehicle engine due to fuel leakage (hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). The instant accident caused the entire fire of the instant motor vehicle, and the damage was partly destroyed by the sports facilities owned by G, 4 gluegs, the Co., Ltd., or the sports facilities owned by the Republic of Korea

E. The plaintiff is the automobile of this case.