logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2018.01.18 2017고단3549
절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a maximum term of one year and eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 13, 2017, the Defendant: (a) infringed on the room occupied by the victims on five occasions, including the following five occasions until October 22, 2017: (b) the victim E in the D church building in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, and the trading partner office managed by F; (c) opened a door in which victims are not locked; and (d) entered the said office; and (e) took 320,000 won in cash owned by the victims E in the book; and (e) took 10,000 won in cash owned by the victims; and (e) took off the property amounting to 21,020,000 won in total from the time to October 22, 2017.

around 12:00 on October 21, 2017, the Defendant released the corrective device by inserting the part of the mother of plastic sculptures into the entrance of the victim at the entrance of the victim in the International church located in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H, and 40,000 won in cash owned by the victim in the book.

Accordingly, the defendant abused the victim's property by intrusion into the room possessed by the victim.

Summary of Evidence

"2017 Highest 3549"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement in K, L, M, E, F, N,O, and P;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Each photograph "2017 Height 3690";

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written Statement;

1. Report on internal investigation (the application of statutes to the verification of CCTV of the I church);

1. Relevant Article 319 of the Criminal Act, Article 319 of the Criminal Act (1) (influences into rooms), Article 329 of the Criminal Act (influences), and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 2 and 60(1) of the Irregular Juvenile Act lies in a history of having received juvenile protective disposition several times for the same kind of crime, and on May 25, 2017, the Daegu District Court and racing support, sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for six months for habitual night structure theft.

arrow