1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in the instant case is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the parts used or deleted as follows. Thus, this is cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(2) In addition, the court of first instance, which rejected the Plaintiff’s assertion, is justifiable even if the Plaintiff’s assertion was examined as to the evidence submitted at the court of first instance and that of the court of first instance, and the content alleged by the Plaintiff is not significantly different from that alleged by the Plaintiff in the court of first instance, and all of the evidence presented at the court of first instance and the court of first instance are examined. [The part to be revised] If the court of first instance 2, 14 of the judgment of the court of first instance, “

The judgment of the first instance court is divided into two pages 2, 18, and 2, 2, 21, and 2, 2, 21, 2, and 2., 3,00,000.

Since the defendant withdrawn from the main defense of safety in the first instance, 2-B of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance.

The main text of the judgment of the court of first instance is deleted from the 3th to the 4th 5th eth eth eth eth, and the 4th eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth g.

On the fourth to tenth of the first instance judgment, the former Road Traffic Act (amended by Act No. 16037, Dec. 24, 2018; hereinafter the same shall apply) (amended by Act No. 15530, Mar. 27, 2018; hereinafter the same shall apply) (the former Road Traffic Act) (amended by Act No. 16037, Dec. 24, 2018; hereinafter the same shall apply) (the former Road Traffic Act before partly amended by Act No. 16037, Dec. 24, 2018)) shall be deemed as the former Road Traffic Act.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case should be dismissed as it is without merit. Since the judgment of the court of first instance is just, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.