Applicant 1 and 4 (Law Firm MalibaviC, Attorneys Choi Young-young et al., Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant)

Dlim Epic Broadcasting Co., Ltd. (Law Firm Sejong Sejong, Attorneys Im-ho et al., Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant)

1. The petitioner and the principal's appeal are all dismissed.

2. Costs of appeal shall be borne individually by each party;

3. Of the order of the first instance court's decision, "7,675 won" in paragraph (1) of the same Article is "7,803 won"; "28,633 won/130-21,640 won" in subparagraph 7 of the order of the first instance court's decision shall be "28,633 won/1.3=22,025 won"; "1,386 won" in the 21st sentence shall be "1,385 won" (692,792,938/50,000, less than 692,792,938/50,000), "21,640 won" in the 4th sentence of the second instance court's decision shall be "22,025 won"; "1,386 won" shall be "1,385 won"; "7,65 won" in the 18th sentence's decision of the first instance court's decision shall be "7,75 won +7,75 (21,60,2,385 won"/38.

The court's explanation on the instant case is identical to the grounds for the first instance court's decision, thereby citing it as it is.

Since the decision of the court of first instance is justifiable, all appeals filed by the applicant and the principal of the case are dismissed. "7,675 won" in the disposition of the court of first instance is "7,803 won", "28,633 won/130-21,640 won" in the disposition of the court of first instance is "28,633 won/1.3-22,025 won", and "1,386 won" in the same part is "1,385 won (692,792,938/500,000 won below)", "21,640 won" in the disposition of the court of first instance 9,94 - 4 - "22,025 won", "1,386 won" in the disposition of the court of first instance is "28,633 won/1,385 won + 1,635 won + 27,306/17,385 (2.3)" and so it is clear that it is "1,67.36.30.40.7 won".4.7.7.4.

Judges Lee Sung-sung(Presiding Judge)