logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2015.09.15 2014나22053
건물등철거
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court’s explanation as to this case are as follows: “Seoul” in the procedure of the auction of real estate under the 2nd 10th 2th 10 of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows: “Seoul shall be deemed to have owned 2/10 shares in the procedure of the auction of real estate; “Seoul shall have paid in full” in the 12th 12 of the 2014, “Seoul shall have completed the registration of ownership transfer on May 26, 2014; and “123,812” in the 20th 20 and 21th 3th 20, “The 495,250 won for monthly rent x 2.5% x 10% x 10% x 495% x 10% x 10% x 4.343,4534,4537 won and 104.35% of the judgment of the court of first instance” (i.

2. If so, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified within the above scope of recognition, and the remaining claims are dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just as this conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow