logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2005. 3. 23. 선고 2004나4856 판결
[배당이의][미간행]
Plaintiff and appellant

Yangcheon (Attorney Yang Chang-soo, Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant)

Defendant, Appellant

Gwangju Metropolitan City North-gu 3

Conclusion of Pleadings

9, 2005

The first instance judgment

Gwangju District Court Decision 2004Da7274 Delivered on May 11, 2004

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance shall be revoked. In the case of a compulsory auction of real estate in Gwangju District Court (Case No. 1 omitted), the amount of dividends of the first instance against the defendant Gwangju Metropolitan City North Korea, of KRW 110,390, the amount of dividends of KRW 14,193,590, the amount of dividends of KRW 385,680, the amount of dividends against the defendant Seo-gu, Gwangju Metropolitan City for the defendant Seo-gu, and KRW 142,370, the amount of dividends of KRW 142,42,260 for the defendant Seo-gu, Gwangju Metropolitan City, and KRW 14,016,687, 270,977 shall be corrected, respectively, from among the distribution schedule prepared by the above court on January 29, 2004 in the case of compulsory auction of real estate.

Reasons

1. A party member's explanation concerning the instant case is based on Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, since the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance are the same as the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance.

2. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case against the defendants is all dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition (the defendant Naju does not present at all on the date of pleading until the court of first instance and does not give any answer to the plaintiff's argument, but the confession does not apply to the plaintiff's assertion of law, not the other party's actual assertion, and since the plaintiff's assertion does not have any legal ground, the plaintiff's claim of this case against the defendant Naju

Judges Park Byung-su (Presiding Judge) (Presiding Judge)

arrow