1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) shall pay to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) KRW 40,986,260 as well as the full payment from January 29, 2016.

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

Facts of recognition

B, around 13:30 on October 23, 2013, the part of the front part of the vehicle E (hereinafter referred to as “victim”) driven by C (hereinafter referred to as “diver vehicle”) of the Defendant Driving Vehicle E (hereinafter referred to as “diver vehicle”) who was driven on the driver’s seat after parking while driving the vehicle beyond the front line of the road at the time of wave, was shocked with the front part of the vehicle.

(hereinafter “instant accident” was already caused by an industrial accident on December 17, 1990, the Defendant was diagnosed by the verteball cryposis, and was judged by the Korea Workers’ Compensation & Welfare Service as 6th grade 5. On February 2013, 2013, the Defendant was subject to multiple divescopic copic copic copic copic copic copic copic copics at Seoul University. Since the instant accident, the Defendant complained of various parts of spinecopic copic copics, spinecopic copic copic copics, and

The plaintiff is an insurer who has entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with the content of compensating other persons for damage caused by an accident that occurs while the vehicle is owned, used, or managed.

The Plaintiff paid KRW 41,763,690 in total for the treatment costs received from October 25, 2013 to November 26, 2015 at the seat of F Council members, G Council members, and Seoul Tae Hospital.

[Ground of recognition] A without any dispute, Gap's evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4, 5, 10, 11, 13, Eul evidence Nos. 2, 9-1, 2, and 10, and Eul evidence Nos. 2, 9-1, 9-1, 2, and 10, the fact inquiry results on the director of the Korea Labor Welfare Corporation's branch office, and the plaintiff's injury alleged by the plaintiff as to the whole purport of the pleading does not have causation with the accident of this case. Thus, the defendant must return the remainder of the medical expenses received from the

Due to the accident of this case by the defendant, the defendant suffered more severe injury and additional treatment. Therefore, the plaintiff is part of the future treatment costs to the defendant.