1. The defendant shall pay 75,00,000 won to the plaintiff and 20% per annum from July 18, 2014 to the day of complete payment.

According to the purport of Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3 as a whole and the arguments, the plaintiff borrowed KRW 19,51,000 as a total amount between the plaintiff and July 8, 2013 at the request of the defendant who operated D, which became aware of through the introduction of C, around April 19, 2013, and lent KRW 50,000 (hereinafter "the loan of this case"). The defendant agreed to pay KRW 75,00,000 to the plaintiff when he pays the loan of this case to the plaintiff plus KRW 25,000,000,000 from the proceeds derived from the business when he/she pays the loan of this case to the plaintiff. Accordingly, the defendant may request the plaintiff to pay the urgent project funds and there is no proof against the fact that the plaintiff borrowed KRW 19,50,000 from June 19, 2013 to July 8, 2013.

In regard to this, the Defendant offered to the Plaintiff the product amounting to KRW 152,00,000 as security of the instant loan, and the Plaintiff incurred enormous damages by withdrawing the products already sold by the Defendant and giving up the transaction partners who could continue to sell the products, and thus, the Defendant asserted that it would offset the Plaintiff into the damages claim against the Plaintiff. However, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit, on the grounds that there is no evidence to acknowledge this.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.