logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.11.04 2015고단3625
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Of the facts charged of this case, the prosecution against intimidation is dismissed.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 11, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months for fraud in the Daejeon District Court Hongsung Branch on December 1, 201, and completed the execution of the above punishment on December 1, 2012.

On April 23, 2015, at around 20:30, the Defendant was subject to restraint on the ground that, in Article 502, Dong C of the Incheon detention center located in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, 30 (Schoolly beneficially beneficially beneficially beneficially beneficially beneficially), the Defendant used the above doors to open the doors of the said room without permission in order to put it out of the above room to put it out of the above room, in order to put it out from the security of the said detention center and the school level E belonging to D mobilelydong.

B. The Defendant, who was demanded from the above E to put in the room, she saw the above E with a large interest, such as “I Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties on the safety, maintenance of order and treatment of prison officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E, F, G, H, and I;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Previous convictions: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to criminal records, investigation reports (prior convictions of defendants A and repeated crimes of defendants A);

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Reasons for sentencing Article 35 of the Criminal Act among repeated offenders;

1. The scope of the sentencing guidelines for recommendation [the scope of the sentencing guidelines] the basic area (six months to one year and four months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties (the obstruction of performance of official duties and coercion of official duties) (no person specially punished);

2. Determination of sentence:

arrow