logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원충주지원 2017.09.21 2017가단21629
소유권확인
Text

1. It is confirmed that the real estate listed in the separate sheet is owned by the Plaintiff.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by each person;

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant real estate”) is indicated as unregistered land and its land cadastre as “B” acquired ownership on May 3, 2016. The former land cadastre is indicated as “D” as part of resident registration number in addition to “C” and is indicated as transfer of ownership on May 3, 1965.

B. On January 16, 2017, the Plaintiff entered into an agreement on the division of inherited property with the content that the instant real estate shall be owned by the Plaintiff’s sole owner on the part of the deceased E, the Plaintiff’s permanent domicile is F, the resident registration number is “G”, and E died on June 26, 198.

C. There is no person registered as a “I” in the voice group H of Chungcheongbuk-do.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 through 9 (including each number in the case of additional number), fact-finding results of fact-finding with respect to the Jar-gun of Chungcheongbuk-gun of this Court, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The purport of the Plaintiff’s assertion is that the Plaintiff’s father, who was the father of the Plaintiff, acquired on May 3, 1965, and for the purpose of registration of ownership preservation, the Plaintiff has a benefit to obtain confirmation of ownership of the instant real estate through the instant lawsuit.

B. The gist of the Defendant’s assertion is that the instant lawsuit does not constitute a case where ownership can be verified against the State, and there is no interest in confirmation, and there is no ground for the Plaintiff’s father He acquired ownership of the instant real estate.

C. (1) The claim for confirmation of land ownership against the country of judgment on the main defense is that the land is unregistered and its registrant is unknown on the land cadastre or forest land cadastre, and the State continues to own the land by denying the ownership of a third party who is the titleholder of the registration or registration.

arrow