logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2017.02.02 2016고정733
업무방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 02:00 on December 12, 2015, the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender under suspicion, such as interference with business by avoiding disturbance of disturbance, and accordingly, the Defendant posted the victim with a complaint against the victim who reported the Defendant to the police, with the victim, with the Defendant’s sending of intimidation to the victim or carrying the false information on the “D” north of the Internet page.

1. On December 16, 2015, the Defendant: (a) sought again at around 23:00 the main points of the Jeju Special Self-Governing City E and the 'D' in the operation of the victim located on the second floor; and (b) sought “C anywhere” despite the employee’s proposal.

Rabk walked and brought in a detention room.

anywhere he/she takes;

B. The victim's main operation duties were obstructed by force, such as avoiding a disturbance for about 30 minutes by driving her farite farite farite, and making customers who had farite farite farite farite out of the country.

2. The Defendant exercised force by demanding an interview with the victim as described in paragraph (1) and avoiding disturbance within about 30 minutes, at the time and place specified in paragraph (1) at the time and place, and at around December 12, 2015, under the status of being investigated by the police for a criminal case, such as interference with affairs arising from the main points of “D” as above, such as interference with affairs, etc., around December 12, 2015.

As a result, the defendant forced the victim to hold an interview or exercise force without any justifiable reason with knowledge of necessary facts in connection with the investigation or trial of his criminal case.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement in each police statement made to F, G, and C;

1. Statement of an investigation report (attached to the summary order, etc. of the relevant case);

1. Statement and image of the investigation report (Attachment ofCCTV Image Data);

1. Application of video Acts and subordinate statutes to a mobile phone image by capturing a mobile phone text message;

1. Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 314(1) of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes shall apply to the relevant criminal facts, the choice of punishment, etc.

arrow