Defendant

A Imprisonment for a period of two years and six months, each of the defendants B, C, and D shall be punished by imprisonment for a period of eight months.

except that this judgment.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. On December 13, 2012, the Defendant smoked marijuana delivered from an unexplosion son’s name at a stress show site where the trade name in the solar state’s whereabouts is unknown.

B. On December 18, 2012, the Defendant, while returning from Thailand, imported marijuana by inserting two marijuana, which were obtained from Thailand “G”, in tobacco cases, into the Republic of Korea.

2. The Defendants A, B, C, and D conspired on December 21, 2012, and smoked marijuana in such a way as to return the two expenses for marijuana held by the Defendant A in the Ising room located in the members of Ansan-si, Ansan-si. at around 02:30 on December 21, 2012.

Summary of Evidence

【Each Facts of No. 1 at the Time of Sales】

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. Correspondence to the request for appraisal, personal immigration status, additional response to the request for appraisal [each fact of Article 2 on the market];

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A’s legal statement;

1. Response to requests for appraisal, the application of additional Acts and subordinate statutes on requests for appraisal;

1. Article 58 (1) 5, subparagraph 7 of Article 3 of the Narcotics Control Act (the point of import of marijuana and the choice of limited imprisonment), Article 61 (1) 4 (a), Article 3 subparagraph 10 (a) (the point of smoking marijuana as referred to in Article 1-1 (a) at the time of the market) of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc., Article 61 (1) 4 (a) and Article 3 subparagraph 10 (a) of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc., Article 61 (1) 4 of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc., Article 30 (the point of smoking marijuana as referred to in paragraph (2) at the time of market, the selection of imprisonment), Article 30 (the point of smoking marijuana as referred to in paragraph (2) of the Criminal Act), Defendant B, C, and D: Article 61 (1) 4 (a)

1. Defendant A from among concurrent crimes: The punishment provided for in the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (the aggravated punishment of concurrent crimes within the scope of the sum of the long-term punishments of crimes in violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. (the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc.)

1. Defendant A with discretionary mitigation: The reason for sentencing under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act.