beta
Text
1. The plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
Reasons
1. The total number of points of the disposition (1660 only points) A 762.79 B 774.22 46.64
A. The Plaintiffs applied for the third bar examination conducted from January 3, 2014 to the 7th day of the same month with professional law school graduates (hereinafter “instant examination”) and acquired the following points.
B. On April 8, 2014, the Defendant held the Bar Examination Management Committee (hereinafter “Management Committee”) to determine the passing criteria of the instant test as follows, who is at least 793.70 points of the total number of applicants, and accordingly, issued 1,550 of the total applicants 2,292 as successful applicants, and issued a decision to reject the instant decision (hereinafter “instant disposition”).
In the instant examination, at least 2,00 applicants 75% (1,50%) of the fixed number of admission (1,500 applicants) determined by the 7th Management Committee on April 26, 2013 shall be determined as successful applicants of 1,550 (2,292 applicants) among the 1,950 applicants (2,292 applicants), taking full account of the number of successful applicants (1,538 applicants), the level of practical experience of applicants, the status of legal professionals' supply and demand, etc., and taking full account of the number of successful applicants (1,538 applicants), the number of successful applicants 1,550 (7.50%), 2,292 of applicants / [Grounds for recognition], the purport of the overall oral argument as to the whole, after deliberation by the members of the Management Committee comprised of academic circles, legal circles, etc.
2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful
A. The plaintiffs' assertion 1) When citing individual provisions of Article 10 of the Attorney Examination Act in violation of Article 10 of the Attorney Examination Act (hereinafter referred to as the "Act"), the Enforcement Decree is "Enforcement Decree" and the Enforcement Rule is "Enforcement Rule".
Unlike the previous judicial examination, the judicial examination is different.