1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

On November 12, 2012, the Plaintiff asserted that, in accordance with Article 750 of the Civil Act, Defendant Bosco Co., Ltd., the management entity of the above city gas pipeline, was jointly responsible for compensating the Plaintiff for the damages caused by the above accident, in accordance with Article 758(1) of the Civil Act, the Defendant Kusco, the management entity of the above city gas pipeline, was jointly responsible for compensating the Plaintiff for the damages caused by the above accident, since the construction was not completed while moving the bus from India to the roadway to the roadway, which was not properly covered.

The written evidence Nos. 1 and 3 alone is insufficient to recognize that the injury suffered by the plaintiff was caused by the defect in the above pipeline or its installation or management, and further there is a defect in the installation or management of the above pipeline hole.

There is no evidence to prove that there was a violation of the duty, which is the basis for the Defendants’ liability.

Therefore, the plaintiff's argument is dismissed as it is without merit, without examining the scope of damages. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.