1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

On November 12, 2012, the Plaintiff asserted that, in accordance with Article 750 of the Civil Act, Defendant Bosco Co., Ltd., the management entity of the above city gas pipeline, was jointly responsible for compensating the damages suffered by the Plaintiff due to the above accident, as the Plaintiff, pursuant to Article 758(1) of the Civil Act, Defendant Bosco, who is the management entity of the above city gas pipeline, was jointly responsible for compensating for the damages incurred by the Plaintiff.

However, there is no evidence to acknowledge that the Plaintiff was subject to the foregoing accident, and rather, according to the statement No. 3 of the Plaintiff’s evidence, it can only be acknowledged that, unlike the circumstance of the accident alleged in this case at the time of the Plaintiff’s medical treatment at the hospital on December 15, 2012, the Plaintiff stated that “in the way of November 11, 201, the bridge was plucked, plucked, and the right signal was created,” unlike the circumstance of the accident alleged in this case, the Plaintiff’s assertion is without merit.

Therefore, all of the Plaintiff’s claims against the Defendants are dismissed as it is without merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition.