logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.05.01 2017나86644
건물명도
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiff and the independent party intervenor are dismissed.

2. The portion resulting from the principal lawsuit out of the costs of appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance as to this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for addition or dismissal as follows. Thus, this is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(A) Of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, each of the participants referred to in paragraph (1) among the reasons of the judgment of the first instance is deemed as having been cited in the attachment of the judgment of the first instance. (2) Any addition or dismissal shall be deemed as “the deceased (the deceased, Jun. 6, 2017; hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”).

The 6th 17 parallel " September 16, 2013" is deemed to be " October 31, 2013", the 6th 19 parallel " around that time" to be " November 22, 2013", the 7th 2 parallel " around that time" to be " September 27, 2014", and the 10th 3 parallel parallel " around that time" to be " September 27, 2014".

12 The 12th one to 4th one shall be as follows:

⑤ On September 20, 2014, the deceased was written as a representative liquidator of H. The date on which the deceased was appointed as a liquidator of H is January 28, 2015, which later than the date of the said written confirmation.

13 The 13th part of the 13th part refers to the participant as “the deceased.”

13 2. The following shall be added to each other:

The Deceased died on June 6, 2017, and at the time, AP, Q, AR, and the Intervenor was the inheritor, but AP, AP, Q, and AR renounced inheritance on August 31, 2017, and the Intervenor inherited the Deceased independently, and accordingly the Intervenor took over the instant lawsuit.

13 Pursuant to the 13th parallel, the 13th parallel “the 13th parallel against the Intervenor” is regarded as “the Intervenor against the Plaintiff.”

13 16th, 18th, and 20th, each participant's "invenor" shall be considered as "the deceased."

14 The intervenor's 14th 7th 7th , 12, 15, and 17th , shall be considered as "the deceased."

The 15th two parallels, 6 parallels, 10 parallels, 12 parallels, 16 parallels, and 18 parallels shall be called "the intervenor".

15.The following shall be added to the 20th page:

The Intervenor asserts that the Intervenor and Defendant C made conditional agreements, and Defendant C did not fulfill the conditions, and thus, the instant sales contract was rescinded.

arrow