A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

(e).

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant interfering with his/her business in a coffee shop in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government around 18:00 on May 30, 2020, the Defendant: (a) was under the influence of alcohol to the victim C (at the age of 58).

“Iskick, Iskicker, Iskicker, Iskicker, Iskicker inside the same year, so Isker that Isker would not respond.”

Hak Hak and Hab, as we can see, threatened women, and interfere with the victim's main operation business by force by avoiding disturbance for about 3 hours to customers on other tables, such as raising sights.

2. The Defendant interfered with the above business at the same time and place as set forth in Paragraph 1 of the above, and recommended the Victim E, a police official belonging to the D District Police Team, who received and dispatched the notification of 112 that “the fluence of the fluence” was “the fluence of the fluence,” to “the fluence of the fluence of the fluence, and returning home to home.” However, the Defendant, while engaging in an act threatening to the victim while the employees, owners, and customers of the said coffee shop report on the fluence.

The victim openly insultingd, such as hinginging to the “Wingk Sheet”.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement of C and E;

1. A complaint;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (Attachment of documentary evidence by a police officer without mobilization);

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The circumstances that are disadvantageous to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution: The Defendant was punished by imprisonment, a fine, etc. at least 20 times for violent crimes, and subsequently recommitting the offense.

The favorable circumstances: The crime of this case is recognized.

The victim of interference with business agreed with the owner of the business in which he/she works.

As above, the defendant's age, sex, motive, means and consequence of the crime;