logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2020.06.10 2019구단7120
보훈보상대상자 비해당 결정 취소청구
Text

The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On July 25, 2000, the Plaintiff entered the 57th Army Team and was on November 27, 2001, when he was on duty, and was discharged from the military service on June 5, 2002 after being hospitalized in the National Armed Forces Chang-dong Hospital on December 21, 2001, when he was hospitalized in the said hospital, he was under the diagnosis of the "full-scale Slive Slive Slive Slive Slive Slive Slive Slive Slive Slive Slive Slive Slive Slive Slive Slive Slive Slive Slive Slive Slives".

B. On June 7, 2002, the Plaintiff applied for registration of the person who rendered distinguished service to the Defendant on the ground that the applicant’s disease was “wholly cut ioned as a slotman (hereinafter “instant applicant’s disease”). On September 13, 2002, the Defendant decided on September 13, 2002 that the instant applicant’s disease constituted “requirements for Military Security” but, on January 29, 2003, the application for registration was dismissed upon receiving “a determination below grade” in the physical examination for new disability rating classification.

C. On June 27, 2018, the Plaintiff filed a second application for the registration of the instant claimed injury to the Defendant, asserting that “The Plaintiff, during his/her hospitalization due to a traffic accident on May 31, 2017, did not have to have a position to knee-feel-feel-feasing, and re-exploe-feel-feasing at all different locations, thereby causing severe damage to kne-feel-feasing.”

On October 22, 2018, the Defendant’s Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement (hereinafter “the Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Services to the State”) did not meet the requirements for the State under the Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Services to the State (hereinafter “Act”) because it is difficult to see that a direct relation to the protection, security, etc. of the State was caused by acute wounds, but it is determined that a person is wounded in the course of a fraudulent boosting event under the command of the head of affiliated military unit as a person responsible for compulsory service, and thus falls under the criteria and scope for persons eligible for veteran’s compensation.”

arrow