logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.10.13 2015고단1800
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On September 4, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for eight months, suspended sentence two years, community service order 80 hours, probation on June 26, 2015, and the judgment became final and conclusive on September 26, 2015.

【Criminal Facts】

The defendant is the actual representative of the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd.

On February 6, 2014, the Defendant: (a) ordered construction of a F-based link to the actual representative H of the K-based F-based F-based F-based F-based F-based F-based F-based F-based F-based F-based F-based F-based F-based F-based F-based F-based F-based F-based F-based F-based F-based F-based F-based F-based F-based F-based F-based F-based F-based F-based F-based F-based F-based F-based F-based F-based F-based F-

On February 15, 2014, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The payment of construction cost is no problem if the construction work is completed because the National Sports Promotion Fund is certain.” The Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “On November 2012, 2012, the Defendant would pay KRW 110,686,000, including the payment of the construction cost for the J Outdoor Entertainment Work, at the time of leaving the work to do so.”

In fact, however, if the KCAG could not receive a loan from the KCAG, it could not receive the construction payment from the KCAG, and if the victim has completed the construction work of a link, more than two times the construction payment would be increased, and the above company would have received a loan from the KCA and received the construction payment from the loan, but it could not receive a loan in a normal way in light of the company's security power, etc. Therefore, the possibility of receiving the construction payment from the above company and paying the construction payment to the victim was weak, and there was no intention or ability to pay the compensation to the victim.

The Defendant is the victim.

arrow