The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the facts charged is the person who is engaged in air-conditioning installation business, and around 12:30 on April 2, 2013, the Defendant assaulted the victim’s breath, etc. in the office of the victim D(61) of the first floor underground of the Seoul Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, on the issue of payment of air-conditioning installation cost.

2. According to the reasoning of the judgment, the witness E’s statement, the police interrogation protocol against the defendant, the investigation report (Attachment to the summary order, etc. of related cases), etc., the above summary order was issued and confirmed on May 24, 2013 on the grounds that the defendant committed assault against the defendant due to the Defendant’s satisfing, satching, satisfing, sating, and satisfing, etc. as stated in the facts charged by the defendant at the time of the instant case on May 24, 2013.

However, the defendant consistently asserts that he had no falbbling in the investigative agency from D to this court. Rather, D had a shock with his falbbing, and that he had committed an assault against D, which corresponds to the facts charged by the defendant, such as assaulting D, etc., only after having filed a complaint against the defendant. The records show the following circumstances acknowledged as follows: (i) at the time of the instant case, the defendant was reported to the police directly, and (ii) as a result, D was investigated by an investigative agency on suspicion of assaulting D. At the time, the statement that the defendant had falblingddd with D was not entirely made; (iii) at the time, the defendant did not know that he had falblingdddd with D; and (iv) on April 30, 2013, which was the end of his investigation; and (iv) the defendant did not have an assault against D, and thus, the defendant did not have an act of assault against him.