1. The defendant's law firm Busan Dong-dong, prepared on February 24, 2015, No. 245 of 2015.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On March 2014, the Defendant posted a job offer advertisement stating that “D,” which is a site for the job offering of women with sexual traffic, sought to engage in the same sex trading business, and “E” reported the said advertisement to the Defendant and provided liaison to the Defendant for engaging in the sexual traffic business.

B. Plaintiff A, upon introduction of E around May 2014, engaged in sexual traffic along with the Defendant, and the income from sexual traffic was divided into the ratio of Plaintiff A and the Defendant divided into 6:4, and the Defendant resided in the monthly rent room that was obtained by the Defendant.

C. From the above date and time, when the defendant colored the sex purchaser through F, which is a smartphone mal, the plaintiff A was engaged in the sexual traffic business in a way that the defendant moved to the promise place along with the defendant, and the defendant waits outside of the plaintiff G, return to the plaintiff G or move to the next place.

On February 24, 2015, the Defendant asserted that Plaintiff A spent KRW 65 million for vehicle sirens and room and board expenses of Plaintiff A in the course of sexual traffic, etc., and demanded the return of the said money. On February 24, 2015, the Plaintiffs drafted a notarial deed under a monetary loan agreement (hereinafter referred to as “instant notarial deed”) stating that “Plaintiff A borrowed KRW 95,000,000 from Defendant on February 24, 2015 at the maturity rate of KRW 95,00 from Defendant on December 31, 2015, and the interest and delay delay rate of KRW 25% each year from Defendant on December 31, 2015, and the Plaintiff B jointly and severally guaranteed the said debt of Plaintiff A.”

E. On April 2015, the Plaintiff filed a complaint against the Defendant on charges of arranging sexual traffic and suspended sexual traffic. On October 21, 2015, the Defendant was punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months for the following reasons: “In the case of violation of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. (Act on the Punishment of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc.) with the Busan District Court’s East Branch Branch of the Busan District Court on December 21, 2015, the Plaintiff arranged Plaintiff A to receive KRW 150,000 and sexual intercourse on December 15, 2014, and arranged sexual traffic for the business of arranging sexual traffic by March 12, 2015.”