logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.09.03 2015고단1614
상해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 20:40 on February 15, 2015, the Defendant: (a) found the victim from the date of the previous day to the date of an erroneous calculation with the victim E (53 years of age) who was an employee of the Defendant; (b) found the victim from the date of the previous day to the date of the accident; (c) opened the victim’s head and body head in several times by drinking; (d) opened the victim’s head and body head from the floor to the point of the accident; and (e) opened the plastic head and head, etc. of the victim, etc. by gathering the plastic head, etc., escaped out of the Schlage; and (e) the victim was able to gather aluminium, which was far away from the floor near theus, and her head and body part of the victim.

As a result, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim, such as the damage of crypum cryp fry and ccos in need of treatment for about 21 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A written statement of F and G;

1. A victim's photo on parts of the victim, a photograph of tools used at the time of assault, and a photograph of the damaged scene;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Article 10 (2) and Article 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act for mitigation of mental disorders;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that a repeated crime for the reason of sentencing is committed during the period of repeated crime, but the defendant reflects the fact that the defendant, the degree of the crime or the degree of damage is not serious, the victim does not want the punishment by mutual consent with the victim, and the defendant's mental illness seems to have a certain degree of influence on the crime of this case. It seems that the defendant's mental illness appears to be considerably stable as he/she currently undergoes mental treatment, so it is necessary to continue to receive medical treatment in the future, and it is so decided as per Disposition by taking into account various circumstances, such as economic conditions,

arrow