logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2020.01.09 2019고단3170
대기환경보전법위반등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10 million.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B A Co., Ltd. is a corporation established for the purpose of waste disposal business, chemical product manufacturing business, etc. in Ulsan-gun Group C, and Defendant A is a person who actually manages the business of the company.

1. Defendant A

(a) Any person who intends to install emission facilities in violation of the Clean Air Conservation Act shall obtain permission from the Mayor/Do Governor or file a report with the Mayor/Do Governor, as prescribed by Presidential Decree, and shall not install or alter emission facilities or run any business using such emission facilities without filing such report or filing a false report

Nevertheless, from January 2019 to June 11, 2019, the Defendant, without reporting to the competent authority, was operated using one pulver facility (50kW and dry) corresponding to discharging facilities, without reporting to the competent authority. From November 2018 to June 2019, the Defendant, without reporting to the competent authority as shown in the attached list of crimes, installed seven discharging facilities, respectively.

B. Wastes Control Act violation B is a waste disposal business entity that obtained a license for a general waste recycling business from the head of Ulsan Metropolitan City on June 22, 2017.

Every waste treatment business entity shall keep wastes in storage facilities within the permitted place of business, temporary storage facilities approved, or other appropriate places, as prescribed by Ordinance of the Ministry of Environment.

Nevertheless, from May 2019 to June 11, 2019, the Defendant kept approximately 810 tons of luminous materials and Fairness from the outside of the factory, not inside the storage facility of the permitted place of business, but outside the factory.

2. Defendant B Co., Ltd. committed an act of violating the above paragraph (1) in relation to the Defendant’s business at the same date, time, and place as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Defendant A

arrow